Texting While Driving Ban Clears Another Hurdle

Back to HomePage
Updated: 6:53 PM Feb 6, 2012 Texting While Driving Ban Clears Another Hurdle Newsplex/AP On a 10-4 vote, the Senate Courts of Justice Committee approved legislation that makes texting or emailing while driving a primary offense in Virginia. Posted: 4:31 PM Feb 6, 2012 Email Address: news@newsplex.com

Font Size:

February 6, 2012

Tapping on your BlackBerry or iPhone while driving is going to cost you if a bill a Senate committee overwhelmingly endorsed Monday becomes law.

On a 10-4 vote, the Senate Courts of Justice Committee approved legislation that makes texting or emailing while driving a primary offense in Virginia.

It's already a secondary offense, meaning you can be ticketed for texting at the wheel only if pulled over for another offense. It would not apply to talking on cell phones while driving.

Sen. George Barker, D-Fairfax, said his bill authorizing police to hit the blue lights just for catching a driver texting is a response to 50 percent surge from 2006 to 2009 in traffic accidents attributed to drivers distracted by their smart phones, and motorists growing more impatient over it.

"The public is very concerned about these people and they are afraid of drivers out there who are texting and not paying attention to their driving," Barker said.

According to a study by the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, sending or receiving a text takes a driver's eyes from the road for an average of 4.6 seconds. At 55 miles per hour, that's the equivalent of driving the length of a football field blind.

"There are a lot of similarities to the driver behavior that we see from a law enforcement perspective - that is the individual driving the car gives a lot of signs and symptoms of that of an impaired driver," said Charlottesville Police Lt. Ronnie Roberts.

AAA Mid-Atlantic and other automobile safety groups have also endorsed the legislation, which Virginia lawmakers have resisted for years.

"Everybody knows this has become a serious problem," said Sen. John Edwards, D-Roanoke. "Texting is particularly serious because you're sitting there with your head down looking at a computer. It's an epidemic."

Opponents questioned whether the bill would force the police to make spot judgments whether drivers are texting — a distinction that includes writing or reading emails, tweets, Facebook posts — or merely dialing a mobile phone. Sen. Bill Stanley, R-Franklin County, called the measure "invasive" and asked Barker if police would have the power to confiscate and analyze smart phones on the spot.

Barker said drivers would have the opportunity to show officers what they were doing when they officers catch them.

Sen. Richard Stuart, R-Stafford, and the committee chairman, Sen. Ryan McDougle, R-Hanover, said they feared the measure could pre-empt officers from a more serious charge of reckless driving, which is punishable by up to a year in jail, a $2,500 fine or both.

"Are you going to take that away from them and give them just a $25 fine," Stuart asked.

Barker and fellow Democratic Sen. John Edwards of Roanoke said nothing in the bill would override an officer's judgment or his ability to cite a driver for several offenses, including reckless driving.

Latest Comments

Posted by: Grandma on Feb 6, 2012 at 10:56 PM

The texting law needs to be amended to include talking on a cell phone while driving. I have seen too many "close calls" by drivers who are talking on phones. Have you noticed the number of vehicles that have dented rear panels/bumpers on their Suburbans, Minivans, etc. from changing lanes without looking? One such driver almost hit me yesterday on 29 North. If you drive on the country roads around here, you will head for the ditch more often than you like because some bozo has crossed the yellow line to get around a biker and almost every time the auto driver is on the phone and not following the rule of "pass only when the way is clear".

Posted by: Mark Location: Charlottesville on Feb 6, 2012 at 10:25 PM

I want to know why the current law (and proposed law) exempts emergency vehicles and police? Why are built-in navigation and dispatch systems exempt? The last thing we need is an emergency vehicle racing lights and sirens and looking away to see a text message update. Truck drivers looking at GPS systems rather than the bridge height signs keep running in to low bridges. Good law, bad exceptions.

Click here to post or read all 2 comments.

Live News	Weather Now	Desktop Alert
Mobile	iPhone App	Text Alerts
Facebook	Twitter	YouTube