UVa. Study Suggests Bias from Courtroom Experts

April 1, 2013

A new study on impartial courtroom experts found that they are not so impartial.

In many court cases forensic psychologists and psychiatrists are hired to provide testimony on the likeliness of a sexual offender repeating a crime.

A recent University of Virginia study of one hundred experts found their opinions were often swayed based on whether they believed they were working for the defense or the prosecution.

"Those experts who believed they were working for the prosecution, tended to see the same offenders as higher risk, more likely to re-offend; they scored them as more likely to re-offend," said Daniel Murrie, a researcher in the study. "The experts who believed they were working for the defense scored those same experts as less likely to re-offend."

The researchers hope the study will prompt clinicians to take a harder look at how they are trained and practice.

The comments sections of Newsplex.com are designed for thoughtful, intelligent conversation and debate. We want to hear from our viewers, but we ask that you follow our rules for commenting. E-mail is required to comment on a story, but it will not be displayed with your comment. For complete rules, CLICK HERE. The Newsplex reserves the right to not post or to remove any comment.
powered by Disqus
The Charlottesville Newsplex 999 2nd Street S.E. Charlottesville, VA 22902 434.242.1919 – Main 434.220.7522 - Newsroom
Copyright © 2002-2014 - Designed by Gray Digital Media - Powered by Clickability 200918241 - newsplex.com/a?a=200918241
Gray Television, Inc.