$cms.template("GoogleMapV3") North Carolina Approves Amendment On Gay Marriage $cms.template("Google Analytics")
$cms.template("REDESIGN HEADER SEARCH") $cms.template("REDESIGN TIMESTAMP")
$cms.template("CSS Navigation") $cms.template("Marquee Subtemplate")
Save Email Print
Bookmark and Share
Posted: 7:20 AM May 9, 2012
North Carolina Approves Amendment On Gay Marriage
North Carolina voters have approved a constitutional amendment defining marriage solely as a union between a man and a woman, making it the 30th state to adopt such a ban.
Email Address: news@newsplex.com
width:319 and height: 239 and picwidth: 213 and pciheight: 159
Post Your Comments
First Name:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
By posting this comment I have read and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy:
You must agree to the Terms of Service to continue.
The comments sections of Newsplex.com are designed for thoughtful, intelligent conversation and debate. We want to hear from our viewers, but we ask that you follow our rules for commenting. E-mail is required to comment on a story, but it will not be displayed with your comment. For complete rules, CLICK HERE. The Newsplex reserves the right to not post or to remove any comment.
Read Comments
  • by Citizen Location: Charlottesville on May 9, 2012 at 01:02 PM
    Way to go NC! @HillbillyVA A marriage license doesn't define love anymore than a drivers' license defines ones' driving ability. Marriage is a legally (and religiously, if it's in the intent) binding contract. I think they view it more as symbolism and want to keep wasting government time and taxpayer money just to make a statement, or get tax perks.
    • reply
      by G on May 10, 2012 at 03:49 AM in reply to Citizen
      "...or get tax perks." -- Translation: "We have our little racket, and we'll be damned if we're going to let someone else in on it."
  • by James on May 9, 2012 at 11:54 AM
    There is "marriage" in a religious sense. There is "marriage" in a civil sense. To deny homosexuals "marriage" in the civil sense is plainly discriminatory, and I cannot believe this discrimination stands. To the religious folks- If you want to bar a gay couple from being married under your religion which itself bars homosexuality, that's justifiable (in your eyes). To extend this into the civil realm, however, is one of the clearest violations of Constitutional church-state separation (and, in turn, liberty of conscience) I have ever witnessed.
    • reply
      by Walter on May 9, 2012 at 01:37 PM in reply to James
      Thanks James, right on!
  • by The Dude Location: Greene County on May 9, 2012 at 08:13 AM
    Two thumbs up, North Carolina!
  • by G Location: C'ville on May 9, 2012 at 07:58 AM
  • by G Location: C'ville on May 9, 2012 at 03:54 AM
  • by HillbillyVa Location: RyeCheer on May 9, 2012 at 12:29 AM
    It's sad when humans cannot have equal rights to love. Don't say its against the bible, Separation of Church and State and the bibles antiquated concepts should not even be in play. In all honesty, I blame all of the straight parents who keep having gay kids though!
  • by joe on May 8, 2012 at 08:06 PM
    all states need this
    • reply
      by citizen on May 9, 2012 at 12:12 AM in reply to joe
      No Adam and Andy!
    • reply
      by Walter on May 9, 2012 at 07:34 AM in reply to joe
      Why do you hate? It's so sad.
11 - 15 - 1 - 0
$cms.template("CSS COLUMN")
$cms.template("CSS Footer")
$cms.template("REDESIGN VIBRANT")