WCAV-WVAW-WAHU | Charlottesville, Virginia | News

Lawsuit Over Panhandling Ordinance Heads Back to Court

February 21, 2013

A lawsuit over the panhandling ordinance in Charlottesville will head back to a courtroom, after a three-judge panel ruled unanimously Thursday that a judge should not have tossed out the lawsuit without hearing any evidence.

Joan Fenton owns two retail stores on the Downtown Mall and says the panhandlers have an impact on her bottom line Fenton supports the ordinance. "I would like to see it upheld," she said. "There are millions of places on the mall where people can ask for money and I don't believe there's a case where someone who was using those locations and has lost any of their income."

Charlottesville City Council unanimously passed the panhandling ordinance in 2010, restricting where people can solicit money on the mall.

"The restrictions put in place left 95 percent of the mall open for solicitation," said Dave Norris, who served as mayor when the ordinance passed and is a current city councilor.

But the Charlottesville attorney who filed the lawsuit on behalf of five homeless men, says the case isn't about panhandling, it's about free speech.

"The case isn't about panhandling, it's about the first amendment," said Jeffrey Fogel, the Charlottesville attorney involved in the lawsuit. "It turns out that asking for a donation is protected by the first amendment. It's no difference when a person is asking for help for themselves."

Business owners on the downtown mall say the city should be watching out for their bottom lines, too, not just beggars or the homeless.

"You see the same four or five guys out here every day," said Mark Brown, the owner of the Main Street Arena. "We hire a lot of folks that are homeless, and those four or five guys that panhandle never come down here looking to get hired."

A three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously ruled Thursday that a judge should not have tossed out the lawsuit without hearing evidence. The case will go to back to court, with both sides presenting evidence to support their case.


The comments sections of Newsplex.com are designed for thoughtful, intelligent conversation and debate. We want to hear from our viewers, but we only ask that you use your best judgment. E-mail is required, but will not be displayed with comment.

  • Comments cannot be profane or vulgar. We will not post comments that use profanity or cross the lines of good taste.
  • We will not post comments that use hate speech. Slurs, stereotypes and violent talk aren’t welcome on our website.
  • Comments should not attack other readers or people featured in our stories personally. Any accusations should be backed up with facts.
  • Any comment we post will be posted in its entirety. We do not edit any comment that we post.
     
  • Comments should contribute to the discussion. We will not post comments that don't advance the discussion. Flaming and/or trolling will not be tolerated.
     
  • Comments should not attack other posters. Let's keep the focus on the content of the story.

    As a host Newsplex.com welcomes a wide spectrum of opinions. However this is a site that we host. We have a responsibility to all our readers to try to keep our comment section fair and decent. For that reason The Newsplex reserves the right to not post or to remove any comment.

    If you have any ideas to improve the conversation or this section let us know. Send an e-mail to webmaster@newsplex.com.

 

powered by Disqus
The Charlottesville Newsplex 999 2nd Street S.E. Charlottesville, VA 22902 434.242.1919 – Main 434.220.7522 - Newsroom
Gray Television, Inc. - Copyright © 2002-2014 - Designed by Gray Digital Media - Powered by Clickability 192355581